Hello guys, welcome back to our blog. Here in this article, I will share FuSa functional safety ISO262623 interview questions asked by Benz, Daimler, Volvo, Qualcomm, Bosch, and other automotive companies.

Ask questions if you have any electrical, electronics, or computer science doubts. You can also catch me on Instagram – CS Electrical & Electronics

FuSa Functional Safety ISO26262 Interview Questions

ISO 26262 is the globally recognized functional safety standard for road vehicles, ensuring that electronic and electrical (E/E) systems in automobiles meet stringent safety requirements. As modern vehicles incorporate complex software, sensors, and autonomous features, the risk of system failures leading to hazards increases. ISO 26262 provides a systematic approach to risk assessment, hazard analysis, and safety mechanisms, ensuring that failures do not compromise vehicle safety. The standard defines Automotive Safety Integrity Levels (ASILs) to classify risk severity and mandates rigorous testing, validation, and verification processes for critical automotive systems.

With the rapid advancement of electric vehicles (EVs), Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), and autonomous driving, ISO 26262 compliance has become essential for automotive engineers, software developers, and system designers. Companies demand professionals with expertise in Hazard and Risk Assessment (HARA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Fault Injection Testing (FIT), and Hardware/Software Safety Mechanisms. This article presents the top 50 advanced-level ISO 26262 interview questions with in-depth answers, helping professionals prepare for technical discussions in automotive functional safety roles.

01. What are the key objectives of ISO 26262?

Answer: ISO 26262 is an international standard for functional safety in road vehicles. Its key objectives include:

Identifying and mitigating risks associated with failures in electrical and electronic (E/E) systems.
Defining a structured lifecycle for safety-related activities, from concept to decommissioning.
Ensuring that functional safety measures are implemented through systematic development processes.
Providing guidance on hazard analysis, risk assessment, and ASIL classification.
Supporting the verification and validation of safety measures to confirm compliance with safety goals.

02. What is an Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL), and what are its categories?

Answer: ASIL is a risk classification system in ISO 26262 that determines the necessary safety measures for different vehicle functions. The classification is based on three key parameters:

Severity (S): The potential impact of a failure (e.g., fatal injury, serious injury, minor injury).
Exposure (E): The likelihood of the failure occurring during vehicle operation.
Controllability (C): The driver’s ability to control or mitigate the failure.

ASIL levels range from QM (Quality Management – non-safety-critical) to ASIL A (low) to ASIL D (highest safety-criticality). Higher ASIL levels require more stringent safety measures.

03. What are the key differences between ASIL and QM (Quality Management)?

Answer:

ASIL applies to safety-critical systems, whereas QM applies to components that do not have significant safety risks.
ASIL-rated components require compliance with ISO 26262 safety processes, including hazard analysis and rigorous verification.
QM components follow general quality standards like ISO 9001 or IATF 16949 but do not need functional safety compliance.
ASIL classification ensures safety through redundancy, diagnostics, and fault detection, while QM focuses on performance and reliability.
Examples: Airbag control system (ASIL D), infotainment system (QM).

04. Explain the HARA process in ISO 26262.

Answer: HARA (Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment) is a crucial step in ISO 26262 for determining potential hazards in an automotive system. It consists of:

Identifying hazardous events based on system functions (e.g., unintended acceleration).
Assessing the severity (S), exposure (E), and controllability (C) of each hazard.
Assigning an ASIL level (A, B, C, or D) based on S, E, and C ratings.
Defining safety goals to mitigate high-risk hazards.
Ensuring traceability from HARA to system-level safety requirements.
HARA is iterative and must be updated if new risks arise during system development.

05. What are the Safety Goals of ISO 26262?

Answer: Safety goals are high-level safety requirements that define measures to prevent hazardous events identified in HARA. Key aspects include:

Safety goals are assigned an ASIL level (A-D).
They are top-level functional requirements that guide system design and architecture.
Safety goals must be traceable through functional and technical safety requirements.
Failure to achieve safety goals can lead to unacceptable risk levels in the vehicle.
Example: A safety goal for autonomous braking could be ensuring that the braking system always responds correctly to collision detection.

06. What is the difference between a Functional Safety Concept (FSC) and a Technical Safety Concept (TSC)?

Answer:

FSC (Functional Safety Concept) defines the functional safety requirements derived from safety goals. It describes what needs to be achieved.
TSC (Technical Safety Concept) translates FSC into detailed technical requirements that describe how safety is implemented in hardware/software.
FSC is independent of implementation, while TSC is dependent on system architecture.
FSC includes system redundancy, fault detection, and safety mechanisms, whereas TSC involves diagnostics, fail-safe architectures, and implementation constraints.
Example: FSC may define a requirement to prevent unintended acceleration, while TSC specifies how an ECU and braking system interact to stop the vehicle safely.

07. How is an ASIL decomposition performed?

Answer: ASIL decomposition allows breaking down a high-ASIL requirement into lower ASIL components while maintaining equivalent safety. Steps include:

Identifying the safety function requiring decomposition.
Splitting it into redundant or diverse components (e.g., ASIL D → ASIL B + ASIL B).
Ensuring independence between decomposed elements to avoid common-mode failures.
Applying necessary diagnostics and monitoring mechanisms.
Verifying through testing and analysis to confirm the decomposed solution meets safety goals.

This method is commonly used in braking and steering systems where redundant ECUs share control tasks.

08. What is the role of SEooC (Safety Element out of Context)?

Answer: SEooC refers to a safety-related component developed independently of a specific vehicle program. Its purpose is:

To allow reusability of safety elements across multiple projects.
To ensure compliance with ISO 26262 even when the full system context is unknown.
To define clear assumptions regarding its intended operating conditions.
To require verification and validation when integrated into a specific vehicle.

Example: An ASIL D-certified power steering ECU developed as a SEooC can be integrated into different vehicles with minimal modifications.

09. Explain the V-model in the ISO 26262 development lifecycle.

Answer: The V-model is a structured development approach in ISO 26262 that ensures systematic verification and validation:

Left side (Development phase): Concept phase → System requirements → Hardware/software design → Implementation.
Right side (Testing & validation phase): Unit testing → Integration testing → System testing → Vehicle testing.
Each stage has corresponding verification activities to ensure traceability.
Helps in detecting design flaws early and ensures that safety requirements are fulfilled before system deployment.
The V-model aligns well with ASIL compliance as it mandates thorough validation at each level.

10. What is FTTI (Fault Tolerant Time Interval)?

Answer: FTTI is the maximum allowable time between a fault occurrence and the system’s safe reaction. It depends on:

Detection time: How quickly the fault is identified.
Reaction time: How fast the system can take a corrective action.
System dynamics: The speed at which the vehicle operates influences FTTI.
If FTTI is too short, redundant mechanisms must be in place to ensure real-time fault handling.
Example: In brake-by-wire, the system must detect and respond to failures within milliseconds to prevent accidents.

11. What are Safety Mechanisms in ISO 26262?

Answer: Safety mechanisms are techniques used to detect, control, and mitigate system failures. They include:

Fault detection: Parity checks, watchdog timers, memory protection.
Fault tolerance: Redundancy in hardware and software.
Error handling: Safe state transitions, fail-operational strategies.
Diagnostics: Built-In Self-Test (BIST), Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC).
Degradation modes: Switching to a reduced functionality mode instead of complete failure.

These mechanisms ensure that ASIL requirements are met and system risks are minimized.

12. What is the difference between Fail-Safe, Fail-Operational, and Fail-Silent mechanisms?

Answer:

Fail-Safe: The system transitions to a safe state after detecting a failure (e.g., shutting off power in case of overheating).
Fail-Operational: The system continues operating with degraded performance after a failure (e.g., redundant ECUs in autonomous driving).
Fail-Silent: The system stops operation completely without propagating errors (e.g., shutting down a faulty sensor to prevent false readings).

13. Explain Freedom from Interference in ISO 26262.

Answer:

Freedom from Interference ensures that a lower ASIL or QM component does not affect a higher ASIL component.
This prevents fault propagation and ensures the safe execution of critical tasks.
Achieved through partitioning, memory protection, and time-scheduling techniques.
Example: A multimedia system (QM) should not impact the braking system (ASIL D).

14. What are the main differences between ISO 26262 and IEC 61508?

Answer:

Aspect	ISO 26262	IEC 61508
Industry	Automotive	General Functional Safety
ASIL Levels	ASIL A to ASIL D	SIL 1 to SIL 4
Focus	Road vehicles	Cross-industry
Hardware Metrics	FMEDA, FTTI	Probability of failure (PFD)
Software Compliance	Tool Qualification, Verification	Safety Lifecycle

ISO 26262 is derived from IEC 61508 but is specific to automotive applications.

15. What is FMEDA, and how is it used?

Answer: Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis (FMEDA) evaluates hardware failure rates and diagnostic coverage.

Steps:

Identify failure modes.
Determine failure effects.
Assess detectability via diagnostics.
Calculate SPFM, LFM, and PMHF metrics.

Used for ASIL compliance and system reliability analysis.

16. What is the purpose of Diagnostic Coverage (DC) in ISO 26262?

Answer:

DC measures the effectiveness of fault detection mechanisms.
Defined as (Detected Faults / Total Faults) * 100%.
Higher ASIL levels require DC > 99% for ASIL D components.
Helps achieve SPFM (Single Point Fault Metric) and LFM (Latent Fault Metric) goals.

17. Explain the Single Point Fault Metric (SPFM) and Latent Fault Metric (LFM).

Answer:

SPFM: Percentage of single-point faults detected (should be ≥ 99% for ASIL D).
LFM: Percentage of latent faults detected (should be ≥ 90% for ASIL D).
Ensures that critical failures are detected before they become hazardous.

18. What is the Probabilistic Metric for Random Hardware Failures (PMHF)?

Answer: PMHF is the probability of a hazardous event per hour due to random failures.

ISO 26262 limits:

ASIL D: ≤10⁻⁸ failures/hour
ASIL C: ≤10⁻⁷ failures/hour

Calculated using FMEDA or Fault Tree Analysis (FTA).

19. What is Tool Qualification in ISO 26262?

Answer:

Ensures that development tools do not introduce safety violations.
Tools are classified into TCL 1, TCL 2, and TCL 3 based on impact.

Tool qualification methods:

Validation & verification
Increased confidence from tool usage
Tool qualification report

20. What is Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) in ISO 26262?

Answer:

FTA is a top-down analysis method that identifies failure paths leading to hazards.
Uses Boolean logic (AND, OR gates) to map fault dependencies.
Helps in ASIL determination and risk reduction strategies.

21. How does Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) Testing help in Functional Safety?

Answer:

HiL testing simulates real vehicle conditions for safety-critical systems.
Helps in verifying safety mechanisms under fault conditions.
Used for ECU validation, sensor fusion, and failure injection tests.

22. What is the difference between a Functional Safety Assessment and an Audit?

Answer:

Aspect	Safety Assessment	Audit
Purpose	Evaluate functional safety compliance	Check process adherence
Timing	Performed at key milestones	Conducted periodically
Outcome	Safety report & recommendations	Compliance certificate

23. What is ASIL Tailoring?

Answer:

ASIL tailoring allows adjusting safety requirements based on system architecture.
Example: Using redundancy to lower ASIL D to ASIL B + ASIL B.

24. How does ISO 26262 handle Cybersecurity risks?

Answer:

ISO 26262 does not directly address cybersecurity, but it recognizes potential threats to functional safety.
ISO/SAE 21434 is the standard for automotive cybersecurity.

25. What are the different verification methods in ISO 26262?

Answer:

Reviews & walkthroughs (manual verification).
Static analysis (code analysis tools).
Dynamic testing (HiL, SiL, MiL).
Fault injection testing (intentional fault triggering).

26. How are Functional Safety and SOTIF different?

Answer:

Functional Safety (ISO 26262): Prevents hardware/software failures.
SOTIF (ISO 21448): Ensures safe operation in expected conditions (e.g., incorrect AI decision in ADAS).

27. What is Latency Time and Fault Reaction Time in ISO 26262?

Answer:

Latency Time: Time taken to detect a failure.
Fault Reaction Time: Time required to transition the system into a safe state.

28. What is a Watchdog Timer, and how does it help Functional Safety?

Answer:

A hardware/software mechanism that resets the system if no response is received within a timeframe.
Used in ECUs and microcontrollers to detect system hang-ups.

29. What are Hardware Metrics in ISO 26262?

Answer:

SPFM, LFM, and PMHF define hardware reliability.
Diagnostic Coverage (DC) ensures fault detection.

30. How does ISO 26262 address software safety?

Answer:

MISRA C coding guidelines.
Static & dynamic analysis.
Partitioning critical & non-critical tasks.

31. What is Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in ISO 26262?

Answer: FMEA is a bottom-up risk assessment method that analyzes potential failures and their impact.

Steps in FMEA:

Identify failure modes of each system/component.
Determine failure effects (local, next level, vehicle level).
Assign severity, occurrence, and detection ratings.
Calculate Risk Priority Number (RPN = Severity × Occurrence × Detection).
Implement corrective actions to reduce RPN.

Used to prevent failures before product deployment.

32. What is Fault Injection Testing, and why is it important?

Answer:

Fault Injection Testing (FIT) is a technique to deliberately introduce faults in hardware/software to test safety mechanisms.

Types:

Hardware-based (short-circuit, open-circuit faults).
Software-based (memory corruption, incorrect inputs).
Time-based (inducing delays in critical processes).

Ensures ASIL compliance by verifying fault tolerance.

33. How does ISO 26262 define the concept of a Safe State?

Answer:

A Safe State is a system condition where risk is minimized after detecting a failure.

Example:

Electric Power Steering (EPS) → Reduces assist instead of complete failure.
Brake-by-Wire → Engages mechanical fallback if ECU fails.
Defined based on ASIL level and hazard analysis.

34. What is Hardware Fault Tolerance (HFT) in ISO 26262?

Answer:

HFT is the ability of a system to continue functioning despite hardware failures.
HFT = 1 means one failure can be tolerated before loss of function.

Examples:

Redundant ECUs in ADAS.
Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) in avionics.

Higher ASIL levels require higher HFT.

35. What is Dependent Failure Analysis (DFA), and why is it needed?

Answer:

DFA assesses failures caused by dependencies between components.
Example: If the power supply and sensor share the same voltage rail, a failure in one can affect the other.
Prevented using isolation techniques and redundancy.

36. Explain the role of a Safety Element out of Context (SEooC) in ISO 26262.

Answer: SEooC refers to components developed without a specific vehicle context but later integrated into safety-related applications.

Example:

A generic airbag ECU is used in multiple car models.

SEooC must be re-evaluated for compatibility and ASIL compliance in the target system.

37. What is the significance of Timing Analysis in Functional Safety?

Answer: Ensures real-time execution of safety-critical tasks.

Types:

Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) analysis.
Task scheduling & latency analysis.
Prevents timing-related hazards in control systems like ADAS.

38. How does ISO 26262 handle Software Qualification?

Answer: Software qualification ensures compliance with ASIL requirements.

Methods:

Static code analysis (MISRA C compliance).
Software unit testing.
Fault tolerance verification.

Ensures reliability of safety-critical software.

39. What are the key aspects of Verification & Validation (V&V) in ISO 26262?

Answer:

Verification checks the correctness of implementation (reviews, testing).
Validation ensures the system meets functional safety goals.

Activities include:

Model-in-the-Loop (MiL), Software-in-the-Loop (SiL), and Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) testing.
Field testing for real-world validation.

40. What is the purpose of Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) Decomposition?

Answer:

ASIL decomposition splits a high ASIL component into lower ASIL components with redundancy.
Example: Instead of a single ASIL D system, use two ASIL B systems in parallel.
Reduces development costs while maintaining safety.

41. How does ISO 26262 address human error in Functional Safety?

Answer:

ISO 26262 identifies and mitigates risks from human error in development and operation.

Methods:

Clear process guidelines (work instructions, safety culture).
Automation to reduce manual errors.
Training programs for developers & testers.

42. What is a Safety Goal Violation, and how is it prevented?

Answer: A safety goal violation occurs when a system fails to achieve its intended safety objective.

Prevention:

Redundant monitoring.
Error detection & fail-safe states.
ASIL-based design constraints.

43. How does Functional Safety impact Over-the-Air (OTA) Updates?

Answer: OTA updates must not introduce safety violations.

Safety measures:

Secure boot & rollback mechanisms.
Update validation before deployment.
Fail-safe mode if update fails.

44. Explain the ASIL-D Compliant Software Development Lifecycle.

Answer: ASIL D requires the highest level of process rigor in software development.

Steps:

Requirements engineering.
Model-based design (Simulink, AUTOSAR).
Static analysis & code reviews.
Testing (unit, integration, system, HiL, SiL, ViL).
Safety validation & verification.

45. What is Back-to-Back Testing in Functional Safety?

Answer:

Back-to-back testing ensures consistency across different testing environments.
Example: Comparing Simulink Model vs. Embedded Code output to ensure no discrepancies.

46. How does ISO 26262 ensure Functional Safety in AI-based Automotive Systems?

Answer: AI introduces non-deterministic behavior, requiring new safety validation methods.

Measures:

Explainability & verification of AI decisions.
AI model robustness testing.
Continuous monitoring & adaptation.

47. How are Fault Trees Used for ASIL Determination?

Answer: Fault Trees map potential failure combinations leading to hazards.

Used to calculate:

Probability of hazardous events.
Impact of component failures on ASIL rating.

48. What is a Functional Safety Concept?

Answer: Defines high-level safety goals for a system.

Includes:

Hazard analysis.
Safety mechanisms.
Verification requirements.

49. Why is ASIL D More Complex Than ASIL A?

Answer: ASIL D has stricter reliability, redundancy, and verification requirements.

Requires:

Higher diagnostic coverage.
More robust fail-safe mechanisms.
Strict process control.

50. What are the challenges of ISO 26262 implementation in Autonomous Vehicles?

Answer: Autonomous systems have complex decision-making logic.

Safety challenges:

Unpredictable edge cases in AI.
Dynamic hazard perception.
Real-time validation of millions of scenarios.
ISO 21448 (SOTIF) complements ISO 26262 for AV safety.

This was about “FuSa Functional Safety ISO26262 Interview Questions Asked In Benz, Daimler, Volvo, Qualcomm, Bosch, Automotive Companies“. Thank you for reading.

Also, read:

About The Author

Chetan Shidling

Automotive | Technical Blogger | Engineer | Content Creator

See author's posts

Share Now